Skip to main content

Why zero sum negotiations get in the way of a better deal


There is a school of thought that believes that certain types of negotiations are fixed pie or zero sum negotiations. Meaning that what I win you lose and the other way around.
A fixed pie assumption leads us to believe that there is a finite resource and both parties are now competing for the bigger piece of it. This assumption is destructive, leads to unreasonable means and unpleasant behaviours. 
In some instances this approach can lead to deadlocks and it damages relationships.
Once a negotiator has abandoned the fixed pie assumption and starts to concentrate on the opportunities on how to create value and grow the pie for both parties the negotiation becomes more complex but also more rewarding for both parties.
In order to create value the negotiation parties need to be interested in each other and understand each other’s interests, pain points and goal.
The following steps will assist with achieving this:

Find a common ground – build rapport
Find something that both parties have in common; maybe you went to the same University or you both share a passion for a sport. That breaks down barriers and builds rapport.

Build trust through information sharing
Sharing information shows that I am willing to open up and tell the other party about my situations. Make sure you only divulge information that you can and want to give away, never be an open book, prepare carefully what can and what cannot be shared.

Use the law of reciprocity
Information sharing does not only build trust it also uses the law of reciprocity, meaning that if I give you something you feel obliged to give something in return.

Ask effective questions
You want to know was much as possible about the other party concerning this negotiation. Make sure you ask effective questions, never ask closed questions that give you ‘yes’, ‘no’ answers.

Separate the people from the problem
Never make an issue personal, talk about the issue that you have to solve in a cordial manner. Avoid using ‘you’ as it sounds like an accusation.

These steps will help moving the negotiation from a zero-sum negotiation to a negotiation where both parties create value and build a relationship.
Remember: You never know when you meet again.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

What is Black Friday and why it is not worth it if you are a great negotiator.

All last week was hyped up by ‘Black Friday’ Sales. But what is it and why do we have it in Australia and is it worth it? Black Friday originates from the US and is the Friday after Thanksgiving which is the fourth Friday in November. Thanksgiving is a public holiday in the US. In the 1950s people used the Friday as a sick day and went shopping to get a head start in their Christmas shopping. Eventually in the 1960s this day turned into another paid leave day or shall we say into a paid ‘shopping day’. It has become a made-up event to drive consumerism. Many believe the term ‘Black Friday’ is used for profit making; black numbers in the ledger books; but that is not entirely correct. While this is the meaning today it meant something totally different in the 50s and 60s.  According to Bonnie Taylor Blake, a researcher at the University of North California, the term originated in Philadelphia by the Philadelphia police as they saw the day as a terrible day. The city was...

Top 5 negotiation tactics that are used by buyers

When a buyer and a seller negotiate over a deal it is in the interest of each party to get the best deal possible. Here are the four most common tactics buyers use in a negotiation in order to get to the best deal possible. The Russian Front This is a tactic whereby the buyer presents the seller with only two options.   One is so terrible; it feels like being sent to the Russian Front which makes you agree to the other options. Compared to the first option the second option does not look that bad now. Don’t make the other party put you under pressure, don’t accept either option. Ask for an alternative or come up with a counter proposal. Good guy bad guy In this tactic you have one person making very high demands. This person is also often cold an unapproachable. The aim is to intimidate the selling party. The good guy on the other hand has a more reasonable approach and shows a willingness to concede and come to a deal. The purpose of this tactic is to set the ...

Negotiate with compassion in times of COVID 19.We are all in this together.

We live in strange times and our lives have been turned upside down. We need to adjust to new social norms, social distancing. We feel that our freedom has been taken away. We can’t travel, can’t meet with friends and family we can’t even just go to the supermarket and buy staples like flour, toilet paper or canned tomatoes. The way we work has changed; the way we interact with each other has changed.  The way we negotiate should also change in these strange and challenging times. While we negotiate to get the best deal possible and don’t want to leave money on the table; this does not necessarily apply in these circumstances where we are all affected in some way or another. What is important now is that we work together, find solutions together and help each other out. I have seen many acts of kindness lately. It’s these times that bring us together. The same goes when you negotiate. These are extraordinary circumstances, and people still need to make deals but it is ...