Kahnemann describes
two different systems of thinking. Fast thinking is characterised by using
cognitive shortcuts, called heuristics, to make acting possible in an
overstimulated environment. Slow thinking is a systematical and analytical
step-by-step approach of thinking. We collect small pieces of information, put
them together and carefully consider options. This approach takes longer since
we systematically evaluate the overall picture.
Reliance on institution through fast thinking increases in a complex negotiation, where negotiators reach a state of cognitive overload. At such times, we naturally shift away from slow thinking to fast thinking.
Taking the time to
logically reason through every decision can be costly, even leading to decision
paralysis. However, to think slow in a negotiation can limit cognitive biases
and is therefore not as bad as you might think. Use 3 integrative strategies to
encourage slow thinking in a negotiation:
#1 Make a list. By writing down all possible variables that might be discussed in
the negotiation, as well as considering all parties involved you create a
better understanding for yourself of what is coming up.
# 2 Avoid time
pressure. Never let the other party put
you under time pressure and never put yourself under time pressure. If
someone catches you off guard and wants to discuss an issue without prior
warning ask to reschedule the conversation for a later time. Remember you are
in charge.
# 3 Don‘t shy away
from negotiating multiple issues at the same time. We tend to wanting to get things done, ticked off the list and
therefore most of us seek to reach an agreement as quickly as
possible. But a complex negotiation will raise new information, unforeseen
issues, and tactics that you did not anticipate. Give yourself the time to
rethink and change you.r strategy Be patient!
Daniel Kahnemann, Thinking, fast and slow
This is a contribution by Jessica Planitzer Master in Psychology and
Management
#negotiationskills
#negotiationtraining
#negotiation
Comments
Post a Comment